HomeEthereumSecurity Alert - Solidity - Variables can be overwritten in storage

Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

-


Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

Detailed description:

Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

  • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
  • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
  • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

The following contracts may be affected:
Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

Types smaller than 256 bits include:
bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

Recommended action:

  • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
  • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Bitcoin ‘Sharks’ Add 65K BTC in a Week in Key Demand Rebound

If you’ve recently stopped paying attention to Bitcoin, now might be the time to tune back in. Behind...

Crypto Surge, Web3 IPO Craze & Altcoin Breakouts

AltcoinInvestor.com Daily DigestOpening Note:Welcome back, Altcoin Investors! Every day brings new developments and opportunities in the fast-moving world...

Meltem Demirors’ Net Worth (2025)

Key TakeawaysMeltem Demirors consistently advocates for adoption in the blockchain space, particularly in Bitcoin, AI, DeFi, and privacy. She has contributed to the growth of...

Layah Heilpern’s Net Worth (2025)

Key TakeawaysLayah Heilpern’s entry into the cryptocurrency space has given her a strong media presence, sharing her insights on politics and Bitcoin. Her expertise has...

Most Popular