HomeEthereumSecurity Alert - Solidity - Variables can be overwritten in storage

Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

-


Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

Detailed description:

Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

  • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
  • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
  • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

The following contracts may be affected:
Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

Types smaller than 256 bits include:
bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

Recommended action:

  • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
  • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

How to Mine Cryptocurrency: A Beginner’s Guide to Profitable and Efficient Mining

Mining cryptocurrency has intrigued me ever since I first heard about it. The idea of generating digital coins through computational power seemed both futuristic...

Uncle Rate and Transaction Fee Analysis

One of the important indicators of how much load the Ethereum blockchain can safely handle is how the uncle rate responds to the gas...

Cryptocurrency for Beginners: A Comprehensive Guide to Getting Started Safely

Diving into the world of cryptocurrency can feel like stepping into a new universe. As digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to make...

The Hidden Costs Of Quantitative Easing During A Global Financial Crisis

Key TakeawaysThis article provides an in-depth analysis of the impact of US money printing on the global economy,Furthermore, it discusses the potential role of...

Most Popular