HomeEthereumSecurity Alert - Solidity - Variables can be overwritten in storage

Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

-


Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

Detailed description:

Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

  • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
  • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
  • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

The following contracts may be affected:
Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

Types smaller than 256 bits include:
bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

Recommended action:

  • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
  • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Announcing the Ethereum Season of Internships

Every year, the Ethereum ecosystem welcomes thousands of builders through community events, hackathons, courses, bootcamps, and campus clubs. However, many newcomers struggle to remain...

Pro-XRP Lawyer Explains Why Circle Refused To Accept Ripple’s $5B Offer

The world’s major stablecoin-powered cross border payments provider Ripple is interested in buying Circle, the USDC stablecoin issuer. The firm made a deal of...

What is Pepe (PEPE) Coin and How Does It Work?

The cryptocurrency space is almost similar to a huge playground where you can expect new players to arrive anytime. One of the most interesting...

Gold Continues Correcting and That Might Be Good for Bitcoin

IntroductionIn the ever-evolving realm of financial markets, investors constantly seek assets that can preserve and grow wealth amidst...

Most Popular